In the media
Beyond Hizb ut-Tahrir
September 12, 2007 12:30 PM
Comment if free... The Guardian
Last night on Newsnight we were treated to a semi-authored piece from Maajid Nawaz, the most senior activist to date to leave the Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir (HT). But his comments went beyond HT.
In addition to being a senior international activist of the party, Maajid also has the street credibility of spending four tortuous years in an Egyptian jail for being a member of the group. For him to go through all that and remain loyal to the party (when defecting then might have saved him from further pain), return to the UK with doubts in his mind (having been exposed to non-Islamist literature), become saddened by HT's dogmatism and then leave the party's national executive a year later is very significant.
In the Newsnight piece Maajid gave an insider's glimpse into the cultish-style workings of HT. He shockingly spoke of their plans should they ever establish a caliphate: "millions would be killed" in pursuit of their expansionist aims, he said.
Maajid is important because he has spent time engaged in a root and branch review of the theological, intellectual and legal roots of HT, eventually coming to the conclusion that their methods are invalid under Islam. What is perhaps more interesting is what he has discovered on the way: the implication on Islamism more generally. Maajid has described Islamism as being "the phenomenon of politically inspired theological interpretations"; ie using Islamic theology to justify and promote your political objectives and ambitions. This goes beyond Hizb ut-Tahrir.
His writings can be viewed here. They read like a heavy legal treatise. To some, this stuff is probably sterile semantics or plain common sense. However, the implication of these arguments for young politically active Muslims drawn to Islamist groups and their thinking is fundamental and will - over a period of time - do much to counter the damaging ideas that have turned Islam into a tribe and polarised the world into two groups: Muslims and non-Muslims, where the former must dominate over the latter, through force if necessary.
All Islamist ideologies believe in establishing an "Islamic state" - they differ only on the methods. What critiques such as Maajid's do is remind us again that creating an "Islamic state" where "God's rules" are to be imposed top-down is not part of Islam.
The significance of Maajid's counter-Islamist argument is that it is rooted in Islamic theological discourse. To pre-empt the expectant accusations that he has become a neocon or anti-Islamic secularist, Maajid states that: "Islam today is not in need of a politically inspired modernist reformation, which is actually the cause of our current crisis, rather a counter-reformation and a return to its true essence by Muslims insisting that their religion is not used merely to serve narrow political agendas." He also reaffirms his opposition to the "tragic invasion of Iraq". He also believes Muslim scholarship is more than capable of taking on HT's ideas and the party should not be banned.
Maajid essentially argues that HT's view cannot be implemented because there are countless other (more senior) classical scholars who differ on HT's political interpretation of Islamic texts. Some scholars say any land where the basic religious requirements of Muslims are met (like praying, fasting etc) becomes "Islamic land" and no further imposition of "Islamic governance" is required. It is a matter of principle in Islamic jurisprudence that where there are opposing views yet each opinion is derived from a recognised scholar then each opinion is valid, albeit conflicting. In such a situation, no one opinion can be imposed upon others or label the other opinions as invalid. Consequently if the land is already "Islamic" according to one scholarly opinion then any attempt to work towards forcibly removing it is invalid, Islamically.
The purpose of the state is to allow citizens to live in peace, security and free to perform their religious practices, not to impose their religious doctrines upon you. This minimum requirement renders a state Islamic in the view of some recognised scholars. So what should Muslims do when faced with corrupt or oppressive rulers? The answer is they do what anyone else does: stand up for justice for all people irrespective of faith, campaign for civil liberties, develop civil society institutions, promote democracy and engage in peaceful political and social reform. And that applies wherever a Muslim might live.
The Qur'an describes how God has blessed all of the children of Adam and that he sent his final prophet as a mercy to all of mankind, not Muslims alone. And on that note I wish all readers (irrespective of faith) a very blessed Ramadan.
Shariah Queries Pose Challenge
Gaza and the radicalisation of British Muslims
Law to protect the young must cover madrassas as well
This is no way to fight terror
A marriage of convenience will not do
Frustrated love and forced marriage
Changing the face of Muslim family life
New model Muslim marriage contract ‘revolutionary’ for UK women
British women who paid dearly for not registering their marriages
New Sharia law marriage contract gives Muslim women rights
Is this the beginning of a new European Islam?
Compulsory lessons urged on forced marriage and 'honour' violence
Law and principle are lost in the crazy politics of 42 days
A shaming victory - Brown 42 days
Islam's holiest city set for 130-skyscraper redevelopment
No more mosques, says senior Synod member
Muslim reformer's 'heresy': The Islamic state is a dead end
Intellectuals condemn fatwa against writers
Met 'let down' victim killed by her family
Divisions In Our World Are Not
The Result Of Religion
Home secretary accused of putting off vote on terrorism bill
Muslim leader says families must help catch honour killers
Blasphemy caused by cuddly animals
Mistake to curb liberties in response to 7/7, says minister
Asim Siddiqui: Beyond Hizb ut-Tahrir
Naomi Klein: Why failure is the new face of success
Naomi Klein: The erasing of Iraq
Naomi Klein: The age of disaster capitalism
Special units to crack down on honour killing
Can Culture Be Bought In the Gulf?
Luxury timeshares on offer at Islam's holiest pilgrimage site
The shortest route to peace… is through Jerusalem
Pope and Islam - Muhammad's Sword
Pope and Islam -
Roots of rationality
Removal of men from holiday flight condemned
How Islam got political: Founding fathers
MPs fear police terror raid will hit community relations
Muslims question terror raid tactics
A pantomime in Forest Gate
Sudan’s Turabi - Muslim women can marry Christian or Jew
Faith leaders unite to champion supportive care for terminally ill
Warning on Muslim schools 'abuse'
Government urged to introduce registration scheme for religious Islamic schools
Call for national register of mosque schools
A call to protect Madrasa-goers from abuse
Abuse widespread in Islamic schools, says Muslim leader
Madrassa children ‘at risk of abuse’
Islamic schools in denial about child abuse
Muslim rally organisers tell extremists to stay away
Calls to scrap holocaust day slammed
The destruction of Mecca: Saudi hardliners
are wiping out their own heritage
Britain to rebrand ethnic minorities
Live chat with the leader of the Muslim
Parliament in Britain
Religious leaders braced for more faith-hate
Police investigate 'backlash' attacks
Fanatics realise worst fears of Muslims
Muslims, do not be fooled by this law
Prisoners freed a year ago struggle
to rebuild their lives
Muslim leaders consult other faiths
for advice on stamping out abuse
Could the tsunami disaster be a turning
point for the world?
Muslim men use law loophole to get a harem
Novice imams must be vetted, Muslim leaders
End these detentions
Muslim leaders blame Blair’s
war on Iraq for growing alienation
End this internment now
Under siege on all sides, Muslims plead
Islamic weddings leave women unprotected
Muslim leaders attack extremists' claims
Talking Point Forum interview with
Focus on forced Asian marriages
British High Court judge condemns forced
Islam and the voice of reason
Passionate debate on a landmark
in race relations
Leave us Muslims out of the anti-terror